Tharp & Young "On Ice Cream" - home Tharp & Young "On Ice Cream" - home
North American Ed. Dec 2021
Asia/Pacific Ed. 2022
North American Ed. Dec 2022
Future Programs
Custom/On Site

Who Should Attend
The Book
Q&A's On Ice Cream
Accelerated Shelf-life
Antifreeze Proteins
Buttermilk: Use of
Calcium Nutrient
Content Claims
Chocolate Ice Cream:
Color in Ice Cream
Cost Management
Cost Management
Drawing Temperatures
Filtered Milks
Glycemic Index
"Good For You"
I/C: Formulation
Hybrid Products
Ice Cream as
Functional Food
Ice Cream:
Ice Cream Inclusions
Ice Cream: Shelf Life
Ice Cream Sweetness
Ingredients Cost
Lactose Reduction
Line Cost Averaging
Low Carb
Ice Cream
Low Carb
I/C: Formulation
Low Temperature
Meltdown Behavior
Mix Aging
Mix Composition:
Effect on Flavor
Mix Processing
No Sugar-Added
Ice Cream
Adding Inclusions
Preventing Soggy
Cones & Wafers
Premium Light
Ice Cream
Prevention of Coarse
Prevention of Fat
Sensory Evaluation-
Sucrose Replacement
Sweeteners: Blending
Vanilla Crisis I
Vanilla Crisis II
Visual Defects:
Pink Discolouration
Visual Defects:
White Particles
Contact Us

Questions & Answers
from "On Ice Cream" featured in Dairy Foods magazine
and sourced from "On Ice Cream" technical short courses.

Calcium nutrient content claims:

Question: What needs to be taken into account to make a claim of a "good source of calcium"?

Answer: In order to make a "good source of calcium" claim, the finished product must contain 10-19% of the Daily Value (DV) for calcium, or 100-190 mg calcium per serving. Standard ice cream (10% skim milk solids, 10% milk fat; 4.5 lbs. per gal finished) contains about 8% DV for calcium. Adding sweet whey at the allowed 25% level actually reduces calcium to about 6% DV. Reducing overrun can achieve a 10% DV or higher. Thus, achieving a "good source of calcium" claim should be relatively easy by managing MSNF and finished weights, or fortifying with any one of a number of calcium sources such as calcium phosphate, calcium lactate, calcium gluconate, calcium carbonate, calcium chloride, or "milk minerals". The are some considerations to note. The chemistry and cost of the calcium source, flavor and texture impact, overrun, freezing point effects, and any necessary labeling disclosure of "negative" nutrients must all be balanced. Too much MSNF can result in "sandy" ice cream. "Milk minerals" from whey, which typically are more consumer friendly, yet more costly, than other calcium sources, needs be considered part of total "whey solids". Additionally, calcium sources vary in solubility and can negatively impact the desired smooth, creamy nature of any given product. This can result in gritty, grainy texture and/or increase the likelihood of icy, coarse, and "sandy" defects. Freezing point depression and resultant impacts on mix performance must be also taken into account. Overrun considerations are critical. High overrun, low MSNF products may not qualify and may require fortification. Lower overrun products with more typical MSNF might qualify without modification. Finally, any nutrient content claim might need to be accompanied by a nutrient disclosure statement of other nutrients (i.e., fat, saturated fat, cholesterol, sodium) that FDA considers an increase risk of disease or health related condition. The threshold amounts of these nutrients to trigger such labeling are 13g fat, 4g saturated fat, 60mg cholesterol, and/or 480mg sodium per serving. Most ice creams, when they meet the requirements for a calcium claim (10-19% DV), meet at least one, or more, of these thresholds. A calcium claim, however, can be made with proper disclosure. It is also possible to produce a product without need for a nutrient disclosure statement. Such a product would, most likely, be some variant of low or no fat ice cream, frozen yogurt, sherbet, sorbet, or water ice.

For more information on"Tharp & Young On Ice Cream" offerings in North America, Latin America, and Asia/Pacific regions click here.